One is why do we and everything else exist? Another is, who is really running the "Big Show," or is it all "just happening?"
Science cannot provide answers to questions that are philosophical, ethical, or subjective in nature. These types of questions often involve personal beliefs, values, or opinions that are not within the scope of scientific inquiry.
Questions about morality, ethics, and subjective experiences fall outside the realm of science. Science deals with observable and measurable phenomena, while these topics involve personal beliefs, values, and emotions that cannot be easily studied using scientific methods.
Science can provide evidence and contribute to the understanding of philosophical questions, but it is not equipped to answer questions related to ethics, meaning of life, or existence of God. Philosophy and science often complement each other by exploring different aspects of complex issues.
Science can answer questions about the natural world through observation, experimentation, and evidence-based reasoning.
Contradictory questions are those that cannot both be true at the same time. For example, "Is the sky blue?" and "Is the sky not blue?" are contradictory questions because the sky cannot be both blue and not blue simultaneously.
which statement best describe the limit of science
science cannot answer questions about what people should do
Science is the application of strict procedures to quantify (observe and measure) all manner of events such as physical forces, human behavior, chemical reactions and biological processes. Hence, science is unable to answer questions where the subject matter cannot be quantified - but even those questions are eventually answered as methods are invented to observe and measure the subject matter.In its short history, science was once unable to answer questions such as: "what is the wind?" - thought to be the breath of gods until the measurement of matter was developed.So, although science cannot yet answer many lingering questions about ourselves and our world, it is only because we have yet to invent a way of observing the subject matter - and not because certain questions are "unanswerable" or "unknowable".
Science has not yet figured out the answers to these questions.
Science questions are science questions.
Philosophy revolves around hypothetical questions that cannot be answered through observation. Science revolves around theoretical questions that can and have to be proven through experimentation to be valid.
Science can answer questions about our physical world.
An idea: much of science is founded on theories which are observed in everyday life, but cannot be proved. For example, science cannot physically prove that any two bodies with finite mass will be attracted by gravity. Theories and laws describe phenomena that cannot be proven.
Science cannot provide answers to questions that are philosophical, ethical, or subjective in nature. These types of questions often involve personal beliefs, values, or opinions that are not within the scope of scientific inquiry.
An idea: much of science is founded on theories which are observed in everyday life, but cannot be proved. For example, science cannot physically prove that any two bodies with finite mass will be attracted by gravity. Theories and laws describe phenomena that cannot be proven.
Some questions that science cannot yet answer include the nature of consciousness, the existence of parallel universes, and the ultimate origin of the universe. These areas remain open to philosophical and speculative discussions due to the current limitations of scientific understanding and technology.
Science can only answer questions about the natural world and how it works. Questions about philosophy, ethics, religion or the supernatural do not lend themselves to empirical analysis.